After it is suggested to proceed with intuitive based consideration, readers are then introduced to Bob. He is faced with the decision to choose to save the life of a child from a runaway train or to save his luxury car.
Bob chooses to save his car. Singer uses Bob as an emotional conduit throughout the essay after he is introduced. Singer uses Bob to conclude the essay as well. He ultimately relies on pathos to persuade readers to donate their excess income. Singer offers readers a breakdown of what it would take to carry out his proposed solution. These calculations are based on information that Unger had collected from unspecified experts.
However, instead of linking them to an individual, Singer assigns them to the United States Government. The text explains that the United Nations recommends that each country should donate a certain percentage of gross national product to overseas aid agencies. An accusatory tone resonates throughout the text. It is assumed that the reader has enough income to make a donation.
The language used suggests that Singer has adopted the expectation that the reader will donate, otherwise they will either pass self-judgment or risk moral judgment from others. It can be inferred that he is accusing them of committing an act comparable to that of Bob. Even the sight of destitution and filth is unimaginable and tragic. Poor children, old men, and single mothers desperately begged for money to people passing by, with plead and hope in their eyes.
I experienced hunger, lived in decrepit shelters, and read books under the candles. Some say they work hard and deserve the reward of spending it. In addition, the U. People are born in poverty. It is not only the people but the government, which possesses much more global control, that should make an effort to save the millions of hungry lives. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? These links will automatically appear in your email.
If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. We try to make TeenInk.
Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it.
Don't have an account? Sign up for one. Wrong email address or password! Summer Program Reviews College Reviews. So Singer has simplified things down, but ended up not giving us enough information to actually make an ethical decision. In either of the situations I just laid out, the death of that child, though regrettable and awful, would be the better option.
Especially if there is a possibility that the train can be stopped safely further down the track. Maybe you tore up that comparison, but giving to UNICEF or some other charity to help feed children would still be a good thing right?
Well that depends on what you see as a bad outcome I suppose. What do these charities actually do? As far as I know, they feed people, bring them aid. The people are still poor and uneducated, the countries are still overpopulated and, in all likelihood, the next generation will be just as large and just as poor and just as hungry.
And guess who gets to take care of that generation? Ayn Rand saw that too. To work — with no chance to rise, with your meals and your clothes and your home and your pleasure depending on any swindle, any famine, any pestilence anywhere on earth. To work — with no chance for an extra ration, till the Cambodians have been fed and the Patagonians have been sent through college. And this is the moral law to accept? This — a moral ideal? One of the other issues I see with these charities is that you often have no idea where your money is going or how it is being spent.
To be fair, Singer addresses that…though not very well. Is it the practical uncertainties about whether aid will really reach the people who need it? Nobody who knows the world of overseas aid can doubt that such uncertainties exist. So, let me get this straight. Let me tell you a story about where money has a tendency to go when you give it to charities. This story is true, but, of course not indicative if ALL charities.
Only a warning to look closely how your money is being spent when you donate it. Several years ago my mother and father ran a small business in Arkansas.
The police in that state had a program that ran on charity, where they gave Teddy bears to children who were in car accidents. A good program and one that is copied in states all throughout this country in some fashion. Yes, he passed that paranoia on to me. He requested a breakdown of how donations were spent. You can request this report from any charitable organization asking for donations.
A Critique For “The Singer Solution To World Poverty”. In the essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” philosopher Peter Singer addresses. the issue of poverty by suggesting Americans give away most of their income to aid those in need.
Sep 05, · the singer solution to world poverty**Essay by Peter Singer, Australian philosopher, offers his unconventional thoughts about ordinary American's obligations to world's poor and suggests that even.
The Solution to World Poverty* PETER SINGER *From "The Singer Solution to World Poverty." The New York Times Magazine (). Using a number of examples to make his case, Peter Singer argues that whatever money. The essay "The Singer Solution to World Poverty", written by Peter Singer, states that the only solution to solve world poverty is for Americans to donate all the money they have that is not needed for necessities to aid organizations overseas. Singers article was published on September 5, in /5(2).
“The Singer Solution to World Poverty” World poverty has existed for many centuries and still exists today, gradually expanding and intensifying. This is the topic that Pete Singer, a professor of bioethics, calls attention to in his article “ The Singer Solution to World Poverty. In the New York Times Article “ the Singer Solution to World Poverty” the author Peter Singer argues that there is no reason why Americans don’t donate money to the needy when they can afford countless of luxury that are .