Obviously, for that, you need to adopt either a pro or an anti gun control standpoint. Notably, this choice will not always be up to you. Your teacher may ask you to write a pro gun control argumentative essay, even if do not share this opinion. In this case, you will still have to gather solid evidence to support your argument.
You should think of it as valuable training. Besides, to write an excellent argumentative essay, you need a solid understanding of both "your" argument and the opposing one.
So, on the bright side, you already have that. Once you have that, you move on to research. As you may guess, you should not focus on your side of the argument exclusively. On the contrary, a strong gun control argumentative essay has to present two conflicting views on the issue. So, you have to conduct some research in both directions. After conducting your research, you should outline your essay and move on to writing.
Like any other essay, your argumentative essay on gun control will consist of three parts: The introduction is where you present your topic, some background information, and your opinion which you set out to prove in your essay. The main body is where you present both sides of the argument and your opinion on the issue along with an explanation of why you stand in favor of this particular opinion. Finally, you conclude your gun control argumentative essay with re-stating your opinion and pointing out why it makes sense.
On a first glance, a persuasive essay may seem not that much different from an argumentative one. However, there is a drastic difference between them. An argumentative essay focuses on proving your point logically, whereas a persuasive essay is aimed at convincing your reader that you are right. This may seem vague, so let us take a closer look. There are three commonly accepted ways of persuasion: Ethos appeals to the reader's sense of ethics and employs the author's authority on the issue.
Pathos appeals to the reader's emotions and employs the irrational. Logos appeals to the reader's common sense and employs logic. In an argumentative essay, you are essentially limited to logos, whereas in a persuasive essay you can use all three methods of persuasion in any combination.
The tragic events that lead to the actuality of the gun control discussion are heavily loaded with both emotion and authoritative opinions. So, writing a gun control persuasive essay and using whichever methods of persuasion you like should be easier than writing an argumentative essay and using only logic and rationality. For example, in a persuasive essay, you can use somewhat emotional language which you are to avoid by all means in an argumentative essay.
As for the pre-writing and writing process, a persuasive essay will indeed be very similar to an argumentative one: The only distinguishing feature is that in your concluding paragraphs you not only explain why your standpoint is right but also dwell upon why the opposing standpoint is wrong. As we have mentioned, gun control is a very broad topic, and if you choose or have to write about it, you can go as deep and as broad as you want.
So, it can be a simple five-paragraph essay or a profound gun control research paper. However, a research paper is still too small a paper to cover all there is about gun control, so you will have to narrow down your topic. Hence, picking the right topic should be your first step. Your topic should not only be exciting to you, but the format of the research paper also demands that it was original - so that you had something new or, at least, relatively new to say about it.
Most likely, you can remain flexible about your topic up until the moment when you begin the actual writing. This means that in the course of your research you may come across some new data which will suggest a more exciting topic, so you should be ready for it and not be afraid to change the subject on the go.
The format of a research paper also suggests that you use more sources in your research than in a simple five-paragraph essay. Most often, you will have to cite at least five sources. Moreover, in a research paper, it is recommended to rely not only on printed materials but also on your empirical research.
To conclude, a research paper - as the name suggests - centers around what researchers have to say on the topic. This means that you should focus on the research data that already exists in a given field rather than on opinions, including your own. Obviously, gun control is the kind of topic that inspires bias. This suggests a lot of opinions on the issue - some more reasoned than others. Regardless of what essay you are writing, it is a piece of academic writing and cannot be a "naked" presentation of an opinion.
All suggestions that you make in your essay have to be substantiated with solid evidence. Therefore, an extensive research is necessary for any kind of paper on gun control. This involves both the background of the issue and the pro and anti gun control arguments.
As we have already mentioned, any talk about gun control goes down to the Second Amendment to the Constitution - so, this is where your research should begin. The amendment was passed over years ago, and it has been clarified by quite a few precedent court cases over the years, on both state and federal levels - so, it is only beneficial for you to be informed about those.
The most notable cases include United States v. Cruikshank , the United States v. Miller , District of Columbia v. Heller , McDonald v. Chicago , and others. Once you are familiar with these, you can say that you are familiar with the historical background of the issue.
Gun control is a polarizing topic, so you probably already had your own opinion about it. Now that you have more insight into the background of the issue, your opinion will be more reasoned.
Nevertheless, no piece of academic writing should be exclusively opinion-based. So, you should also be well-informed about what experts have to say on the issue from both sides of the argument. Between these two extremes, there is also a great variety of viewpoints and opinions. If you want to discuss such a sensitive issue in an academic paper, you cannot afford to have an opinion based on nothing, like some people have. You have to be well-informed on the background of the issue, as well as on all the multitude of expert opinions about it.
To do that, you first have to look at where it all began — the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States that was passed in and granted the individuals the right to possess firearms. Since then, the understanding of the Second Amendment has evolved a great deal, and we are still far from consensus on this question.
The discussion continues on all levels, and a student's gun control essay is really just as good ground to discuss it as any other. A research on any topic suggests looking through all the information you find on this topic. With gun control, you will have no problem finding information, since there is a lot of it out there. In fact, the amount of information on this topic is quite overwhelming — much more than one can digest at a time and much more than one may need to write an excellent essay.
Given these massive amounts of potential sources of information, you should make sure that you are not wasting your time looking through sources that are irrelevant to your topic, even if they may be quite an exciting read. To do that, you need to make your research well planned out and know where to look the relevant information.
As we have already pointed out, when you want to get yourself well-informed on any particular issue, you begin with investigating its roots. When we talk about gun control discussion, it all roots from the Second Amendment.
It was passed along with the rest of the Bill of Rights at the very dawn of our country in the late 18 th century. There, the right for individual gun possession was first formulated and regulated. This document is the source of our entire understanding of individual gun possession, so you need to be familiar with this document if you look to talk about gun control and be taken seriously.
Much time has passed since then, and there have been many precedents where the court had to rule to clarify certain aspects of the Second Amendment — on both state and federal levels.
The most noteworthy relevant court cases are as follows:. These and some other court cases have largely contributed to today's understanding of individual possession and gun control, so being familiar with them is also necessary for building your expertise on gun control.
Getting familiar with the historical background of the gun control discussion is only half of your research. You will also need to be aware of the present-day state of this ongoing discussion. To make it easier for you, we have taken the liberty and put together a selection of insightful pieces from both sides of the gun control discussion.
These pro gun control articles state that the current gun control regulations are not effective enough to confront gun violence and talk about how the situation can be improved:. Since everybody talks about gun control today, Amanda Marcotte of the Rolling Stone magazine has also come up with this surprisingly insightful piece. She does not claim to be an expert but rather speaks from the stand of one of the people at whom pro-gun arguments are supposed to aim, and explains why they don't work.
If you feel like you are not well-informed enough about gun control, this article is priceless for you. It briefly sums up the spirit of the Second Amendment as it was years ago and follows its evolution through the years, as well as the evolution of firearms themselves. This article is a detailed overview of the present-day gun control regulations in California, which is arguably the strictest in the land.
They conclude by stating that the current regulations are not effective enough, as they involve a number of loopholes. The authors suggest that the regulations should be made even stricter. Gun Control and the Constitution: Should We Amend the Second Amendment? Barrett points out that the language in the text of the Second Amendment is quite vague and leaves too much room for interpretation.
So, instead of fixing or clarifying it, he suggests that a whole newest of regulations is necessary, clear and direct. Bovy takes a more radical stand in this discussion. She claims that we need to get rid of individual gun possession as a whole, with no exceptions.
In his time, Hamblin was fired for drafting a piece on gun control that was not approved by his superiors. In this article, he talks about how unhealthily politicized the topic is and how our society is incapable of seeing it as it is and not as an attack on our whole set of rights and freedoms.
These anti gun control articles insist that the existing gun control regulations are ineffective because they are too strict and suggest that these regulations need to be loosened. Here is what the experts from this side of the argument have to say:. DePhilippis and Hughes are convinced that the opinion that stricter gun regulations can end gun violence is wrong and that it is a myth that needs to be debunked.
If you want to read more from them, feel free to check out their gun violence prevention site Armed With Reason. Davidson takes a scholarly approach on the issue. He attempts to give a definition of gun control and critically scrutinize the most common gun control approaches and methods. This emotional piece is written by the widow of Chris Kyle whose tragic story was put on screen in American Sniper.
If you want to know more about her take on gun control policy, you can read about it on her book American Wife: As a recognized author of books on crime and a respected teacher at Pepperdine University, Wilson uses his expertise to analyze what exactly pro gun control side has to offer.
He concludes that they are being too populist and have no concrete plan of action. Hunter works of Rand Paul, the conservative senator. The article focuses on stories where gun-owning individuals helped to confront crime and violence, as opposed to the stories where such individuals cause violence — that the pro gun control lobbyists like to manipulate.
Hardy is a practicing attorney from Arizona. He blames pro gun control activists for being deaf to arguments from the anti gun control camp and incapable of a constructive dialogue.
According to him, they only see their position and will not rest until all individual firearm possession is banned for good. Being well-informed about the gun control debate is crucial for writing an excellent gun control essay, but it is still only half the battle.
You still need to know what kind of essay you have to submit and what your teacher expects of you. Here are the kinds of gun control essays that you may have to write:. Since gun control is an extremely debatable topic, it is most exciting to talk about which side of the debate is right. This is why, students most often have to write either argumentative or persuasive essays on gun control.
If you have to write a persuasive essay, you know what you should do first — pick a topic that can inspire a debate between at least two opposing sides. You also need a compelling argument that you will defend. Here, you also have nothing to worry about, because both sides of the gun control debate have numerous compelling arguments. As soon as the latter two elements are in place, it is the high time to start your research. Putting it briefly, first, you get yourself familiar with the relevant historical background of the issue, and then you collect expert opinions.
Notably, you should not limit yourself to the expert opinions from your side of the debate. You should also be aware of what your opponents have to say, so you know how to rebuke their claims in advance.
As you know, a persuasive essay is the kind of essay where you have to convince a hypothetical opponent that your viewpoint on the subject is correct and theirs is not. So, this is your ultimate goal when writing such an essay and you should use all means at hand to achieve it. By all means at hand we mean each of the three methods of persuasion:.
Persuasive gun control essay. A persuasive essay is where you have to convince an opponent that you are right. For example, you can try and convince a pro gun control lobbyist that strict regulations are not the answer to a problem. Reflective Essay Outlines. Gun Control Essay. Conclusion Paragraph Examples. Best Abstract .
Reports of shooting resulting in a large number of casualties often raise the issue of gun control. The efficacy of the approaches use towards the control of the gun access comes into sharp focus.
Process gun control essay. In a process essay, you explain how to do something – for example, how to solve a problem. You can talk about how gun violence can be confronted by imposing stricter gun control regulations or by loosening them up. Synthesis Essay Outline; Narrative Essay Outline; Literary Analysis Outline; Responsibility Essay. Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on Outline Gun Control.
Gun Control Gun control has been a hot topic for very long time. People on the anti- gun control side believe that gun ownership is a Constitutional right backed by the Second Amendment. The anti- gun believe that you . Gun Control Essay Outline To outline your essay on gun control, you can follow some general guidelines. Your essay will contain an introduction, a body, and a conclusion.