Skip Nav

Theory of knowledge (IB course)

A Competitive IB Theory of Knowledge Essay (ToK) Development

❶Did this article help you?

How to Structure a Theory of Knowledge Essay

Navigation menu
TOK Essay Topics
Okay here we go...

Again, if you don't mind the jitters and all that jazz, it may be worth your time to check out the LipoVida brand. Otherwise, Pure GCE gets my vote. Good product except the product isn't the best. I've tried a few different brands and this isn't the worst but it's not the best. Personally I would recommend another brand.

IB Qualified Writers are Ready to Help you with your ToK Essay

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

The theory of knowledge essay is the externally-assessed part of TOK, in contrast to the presentation, which is marked ‘in house’. You choose from a list of 6 different prescribed titles, and try to somehow cram the sum of your TOK knowledge into words.

Privacy FAQs

The TOK essay is about knowledge (how we come to know things). It helps to think of the essay as though you're showing the most interesting bits of a conversation between two smart people, about how we know things.

About Our Ads

Example essays. As part of theory of knowledge (TOK), each student chooses one essay title from six issued by International Baccalaureate®(IB). ample TOK Essays with Comments and Scores ep. These essays have not, to the best of my knowledge, been published as exemplars or used by the IBO for any other purpose, including training. The total score shown for each essay is the total score that was issued THEORY OF KN “Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of reason as .

Cookie Info

The Knowledge Framework is a scheme that contains five elements: scope and application, language, methodology, historical development and links to personal knowledge. Assessment. Theory of knowledge is assessed in two parts: an externally examined 1,–1, word essay and an internally assessed presentation. Sep 07,  · Understanding the knowledge issues: your essay must be focused on the knowledge issues, link and compare at least two knowledge issues, show relevancy between at least two knowledge issues, and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the knowledge issues%().