Serial murderers are distorted reflections of society's own values, according to new research. Traditionally the behavior of serial killers has been viewed through a psychological framework, blaming customary factors like bad parenting, maladjusted brain chemistry or past abuse. But Kevin Haggerty, a University of Alberta sociologist and criminologist, argues that society -- not psychology -- is responsible.
He published his study in the August issue of the journal Crime, Media, Culture. Take the example of Robert Pickton, the Canadian pig farmer who boasted of murdering at least 49 women over several decades. Haggerty cites Pickton's choice of victims and the ease with which he was able to find them. Like many other serial murderers, Pickton's victims were drug-addicted prostitutes he picked up from the same skid row in Vancouver, British Columbia, time and time again.
Educated guesses have been proposed on the biological explanation of why serial killings occur and criminologists have found that fear is the greatest motivator for serial killers.
In fact, individuals understand that fear is a powerful emotion and thus violence makes each and every one of us fearful. In spite of sociological research, little is still known about serial killers and their reasons.
One prominent form of thought in the area of sociology is the McDonald Triad. Through this framework, an understanding of serial killers is ascertained through comprehending the early warning signs. This they say allows for law enforcement and other arenas of protection of society to have preventative measures in place.
The theory suggests that. Gottfredson and Hirschi even go as far as to say that "self-control is fully formed by the fifth grade. Those who develop poor self-control will fail throughout life in adapting to social norms.
The theory in effect seeks to link self-control to childhood. Almost all research on the subject of serial killers states that childhood is the undercurrent of why serial killers act the way they do and Gottfredson and Hirschi's theory confirms that. With the self-control theory, the thought is that the relationship between one's parents is what builds the life of the man or woman. Sears in his book, To Kill Again , reasons that a lack of nurturing and proper love is the reasons for abuse in the serial killer.
From a sociological standpoint, knowledge is not gained by the young child as to how individuals should act in society. Kids that grow up in this type of environment do not establish meaningful relationships and do not connect on any type of levels i. Sexual connection is removed as well. Gottfredson and Hirschi do not address the improper raising of children and this has often been noted by sociologists in profiling serial killers. This is why the world of criminology has opted to shine the light on reasons why serial killers commit crimes, but have not been able to definitively express one specific reason.
Self-control theory is deficient then for many reasons as it does not form a variation in the improper socialization between sexes. Serial killers are simply difficult to understand.
This is understood when researchers are proposing certain theories in their predictions as to why individuals perform the acts that they do. It is important to note that the theory is more compatible with the understanding of serial killers than it is not. Literature has exhibited that characteristics associated with the theory are more in line with the development of the personality of the serial killer potentially guiding the light toward more sociological comprehension of what makes the serial killer tick.
Sociologists have also studied the social positions of serial killers. Exploration into this topic has yield enlightening perceptions about deviance and identity in the serial killer. A specific theory here is the communication theory of identity which provides a thorough understanding of the identities of serial killers within the framework of society.
It draws attention to how serial killers manage their identities. When examining deviance and the communication theory of identity, sociologists are able to state that deviance is often related to serial killers.
Deviance is a major representation of the identity and the interpretation of that identity. Qualitative research regarding serial killings does not tend to address serial killers but more so is a presentation of the types of identities of serial killers.
It more so seeks to investigate the identity of the serial killer in society. A growing body of literature has explored the topic of serial killers and sought to further try and identity how that individual manages themselves in society. Lagrange and Milburn denote that one's identity is developed over the course of one's life. Social roles and memberships to certain groups are also highlighted as giving meaning and prominence to one's identity.
The complex nature of identity is what connects the world of sociology and psychology. Communication theory of identity then identifies that identity is the byproduct of communication Henson and Olsen.
In other words, through communicating with people in society; individual identities are formed and created. Serial killers have frequently been categorized by law enforcement as being either organized or disorganized. Organized killers typically plan their kills in advance, while disorganized killers lack the strategic impulses to plan their kills and are less choicy about their victims and the characteristics that they should embody.
The distinction between the organized and disorganized killer is noted as one of geography as organized killers are harder to catch. Their spatial behavior changes accordingly: Law enforcement has tried to develop certain techniques to catch organized killers using sociological research.
It is essential that serial killers be understood within the larger framework of societal relations. Society in essence manufactures, enables and constrains their mental state as research has suggested. Although there are a variety of theories that exist on the subject and even larger generalizations that have been made to better apprehend the mind of the serial killer, it is demonstrably evident that they live and kill within varying sets of social conditions.
This 5 page paper explores sociological theories that may explain the phenomenon of serial murder, focusing upon on the most appropriate, the concept of anomie. Bibliography cites 5 sources. This 11 page paper is an annotated bibliography of journal articles which concern female murders and the difference and similarities between female and male killers. The bibliography cites 32 sources.
This 8 page paper looks at different serial killers and attempts to determine if their future actions could have been determined prior to the events by personality analysis. The paper discusses the similarities and differences, as well as the time and aspect of any observed personality changes. The bibliography cites 6 sources.
This 6 page paper examines Seltzer's book entitled Serial Killers. Seltzer's view is sound but it focuses on culture whereas the literature is dominant in other areas. This book review examines serial killing almost from a philosophical perspective, while keeping sociological and psychological implications in mind. Bibliography lists 10 sources. Spree serial murder satisfies the criteria of geographical separation, but rarely is there a "cooling off" period.
Classic serial murder satisfies both criteria: Bibliography lists 6 sources. Although much has been written and many theories brought forth on identifying the criminal mind, it is still evident that there is no foolproof way to know in advance whether a person is prone to criminal activity.
Some personality traits have been shown to be more prevalent in the makeup of serial or mass murderers, and this paper addresses those traits and the motivations behind the killings.
This 11 page paper presents an overview of the characteristics of both male and female serial killers, an analysis of the differences from a feminist perspective and a description of the Aileen Wuornos murder case. A paper which looks in detail at the social phenomenon of serial killing, with reference to sociological, psychological and biological theories. The paper also considers specific examples of serial killers, in particular Aileen Wuornos.
Bibliography lists 13 sources. For the most part, people are fascinated by the stories of serial killers because it is so difficult to believe that such murderers could live undetected in a community for such long periods of time. Bibliography lists 4 sources. An eight page paper which investigates the relevance of adoption in the psychological background of serial killers, and considers how important an influence it is in comparison to other aspects of family life and upbringing.
The paper includes a comparison of two serial killers, one who was adopted and one who was not. To be terrorized is to be coerced by violence or the threat of violence; that contemporary global society is in the middle of an epidemic of terrorism speaks to the inherent power that intimidation has upon people. When one thinks of terrorism the first thoughts that come to mind are those of a political nature, such as the assault on September 11th; however, it is manifested in myriad other ways than the hate crimes of political terrorism, such as with serial killers.
The erroneous belief that serial killers and mass murderers are one and the same is both common and erroneous; the only distinctive similarity between the two is how they obtain complete and ultimate control over their victims and their own lives just prior to committing the homicides. Besides this single connection, these two types of slayers are quite unique in both a psychosocial and behavioral perspective. Mass murderers typically make one fell swoop upon several victims at a single location while serial killers characteristically murder one victim at a time, are very methodical and wait between killings.
By contrast, serial killers evoke greater fear due to the unknown factor of when and where their next murder will be. This 3 page paper defines each type of killer and compares and contrasts them. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Research paper on serial killers The definition of a serial killer is traditionally noted as a person who has a particular psychological motivation for killing. The murders are usually performed in a unique fashion and the killer has a signature that they are often known for.5/5(2).
Research Paper on Serial Killers January 7, writer Research Papers 0 A serial killer is the murderer who has killed a great number of people, and his crimes have some common features and manner of execution.
Serial Killers Topics on Serial Killers for research papers may want to illustrate how these criminals differ from other criminals. Crime has always existed, including the crime of luvenagesov.ga are different kinds of murders that occur. This sample Serial Killers Research Paper is published for educational and informational purposes only. Like other free research paper examples, it is not a custom research luvenagesov.ga you need help writing your assignment, please use our custom writing services and buy a paper on any of the criminal justice research paper topics.. People are fascinated by violent crime, and serial .
Cover of Serial Murder studyThe research focuses on how and where victims’ bodies were discovered, and what that says about the killers. The body disposal scenarios used by offenders were. Future Research on Serial Killers. Serial murder is a rare event, thereby making it difficult to research. At present, nearly all of what we know about serial murder is based on a few case studies conducted on individuals who agreed to be interviewed by law enforcement and a handful of archival studies using information gleaned from .